Physics 245A, Introduction to High Energy Physics Winter 2006 TR 9:00-10:20 am, 158 Roessler. Text: (This will also be useful for 245B next quarter.) Quang Ho-Kim and Pham Xuan Yem, Elementary Particles and Their Interactions Other books of interest: Seiden, Particle Physics, ... Perkins, Intro. to High Energy Physics Leader and Predazzi, An Introduction to Gauge Theories ... Griffiths, Intro. to Elementary Particles Roe, Particle Physics ... Bowler, Femtophysics Coughlan and Dodd, The Ideas of Particle Physics Martin and Shaw, Particle Physics Hughes, Elementary Particles Also, if you intend to do particle physics, and you are not yet on the Particle Data Group mailing list, you should request a Particle Properties Data Booklet from pdg@lbl.gov or Particle Data Group MS 50R6008 Lawrence Berkeley Lab. Berkeley,CA 94720 http://pdg.lbl.gov This will be very handy this quarter and in the future. The full version (at about a thousand pages is on line at the URL above. You should get familiar with the preprint archive at Cornell. This is where all new papers go and where everyone goes to see what's new and to read papers: http://www.arxiv.org Other courses: You should have had 230A and be taking 230B, and you should take as soon as they appear 245BC, 252B, 223B, 246(after you have completed 230 and 245), 250. Other courses to consider: 260 and 262. It's not too soon to start attending 292, the particle physics seminar. Office hours: Whenever I am in -- usually most of TuTh afternoons and after about 3pm on MWF. For something more definite, you can send me email to make an appointment. Email: jekiskis@ucdavis.edu We will use electronic communication in the course. There is a class maiing list: phy245a-w06@ucdavis.edu. If you are registered for the class, you are automatically on the list, otherwise, you need to talk to me to get on the list. The list uses UCD email addresses of the form user@ucdavis.edu. You should check your email every day for possible messages relevant to the class. Messages to the list are archived at https://listproc.ucdavis.edu/class-secure/200601/phy245a-w06. Our home page is at http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/kiskis/courses/phy245a-w06/phy245a_hp.html. The website will be the main place I put information for the course. By noon Wednesday, Jan. 4, please send me email with the following info.: 1) Name 2) Year in grad. school 3) Have you had a previous undergraduate or graduate high energy physics course? If so, give the length of the course and the textbook. 4) In what subfield of physics do you intend to do your thesis research? 5) Are you currently involved in research? If so, in what group? 6) Why are you taking this course? 7) What do you hope to get out of it? 8) If you could have the answer to one specific question in particle physics, what would you ask? Purpose of the course: This course is for all students who intend to do research in particle physics, nuclear physics, or cosmology. It is also good for anyone else who wants to know about the field. It is a phenomenological introduction to high energy physics. It does not do heavy theory. For that, you have 230 and other courses. The main theme will be hadron structure from one point of view or another. The electroweak theory will be covered more completely in 245B. To do particle physics you need to know some facts and concepts and speak the jargon of the field. This course will give you an opportunity to learn this necessary background stuff that all good particle physicists know. In addition, this is the general information about particle physics that you are expected to know at your oral. So you can also think of the topics we cover as a study guide for your oral. Since we will move fairly quickly, you will probably want to spend more time studying these topics after the course is over and before your oral. Philosophy, structure, and grading: (Although teaching is not possible, learning is.) Formal lectures are futile for at least two reasons. 1) Research has shown that people learn very, very little when they are passive and someone else is talking at them. 2) There is too much stuff. It is a physical impossibility to give start-to-finish lectures on all the subjects that would be nice to cover. There is more in the reading than we can discuss in any detail in the 27 hours that we have. From this, two remarks follow: a) since it's futile, we won't have formal lectures b) since there is so much stuff, a big part of your work will be to figure out what is central and important. I hope to be of real help to you in this. You must think about what you read and try to develop perspective. My role: First of all, I cannot TEACH you anything. At best, I can transmit some information--raw data. (But the reading can usually do this better.) I cannot transmit knowledge or understanding. I will try to provide a framework in which it will be possible for you to construct your own understanding. I can be a guide and a resource. Your role: You need to collect some information. Your main source is the readings. That is the raw material from which you will work to CONSTRUCT your own understanding. Each person must go through the process. It cannot be transmitted. While you read, think and ask yourself questions. Talk with other students and with me. The most important thing is to take an ACTIVE role. This isn't like watching television. If there is not enough voluntary discussion, I will call on people. To encourage active participation by all of us, the class will be organized as follows: Divide into groups of 3 or 4 people. Please work this out among yourselves before the start of the second class on Tuesday. You will keep the same groups for the quarter. For each meeting, there will be a reading assignment which you should read and think about BEFORE the lecture. Class starts at 9:00. At 9:05, each group is required to produce its most pressing question on the reading for class discussion. From 9:00 to 9:05, you will discuss this in your groups. Since that is not a lot of time, you will need to be prepared with ideas and perhaps have discussions before the start of class. These need not be deep or sophisticated questions. Things like "We read sec. 2 ten times, and it still makes no sense. What's going on there?" are encouraged. We will discuss the questions from each group. After that, I will display a few questions for you to work on in your groups. You will then present your results for discussion. I will try to choose questions that bring out the most important points of the reading. The purpose of this is to get you really involved in and thinking about the topics for the day. Following that, there will be a 10 min., open book quiz on the reading for that day. This will be a group effort. You will work with the other members of your group to produce one solution from your group to be handed in for grading. There will be problem sets. You are encouraged to discuss the problems with others. However, the solutions that you hand in should be your own work. Problem sets are due at the start of lecture on the indicated day. Use 8.5"x11" paper and write on one side only. You will keep a journal. There will be no exams. Journals: Logistics: Write the journal entries on separate (not bound) sheets of 8.5x11 paper. Date each entry and put your name on it. Keep all your entries in a folder or large envelope. Each entry should be 1-2 pages. You should do two entries per week. Hand them in at the start of class on Tuesday. I will read these, comment when appropriate, and return them to you at the next class. I will not grade each entry, but your participation in journal writing will be part of your grade for the quarter. Content: The journals should NOT be simply class notes, a summary of the reading, or tentative calculations with no description. They should be your thoughts and reactions to the material. Suggestions: 1) Reflect upon the reading and class discussions. 2) Work out on paper ideas that you are having trouble understanding. Question. Speculate. 3) Look for connections to earlier parts of the course and to other parts of physics that you have studied. The journals should reveal your process of working on the subject not the final, polished product. A good journal is not one that is "right" but rather one that shows how you have fully engaged the subject. The ratio of words to equations should be high. The words should be organized into COMPLETE SENTENCES, otherwise it will be impossible for me to follow your thoughts. The grading will be on problem sets, quizzes, journals, and participation in class discussion. Presentation counts. Papers that are messy, hard to read, or disorganized, WILL lose points.